澳洲論文代寫 > assignment代寫 > Operating Systems Assignment > > 正文

Operating Systems Assignment

operating systems assignment 價格

5.5  Why does an auditor operating systems assignment 價格 to consider the persuasiveness of corroborating evidence? Explain.

Corroborating evidence is evidence that supports the client’s records in terms of accuracy. Corroborating evidence can be internally generated by the client, such as copies of documents, externally generated evidence held by the client, such as bank statements and supplier invoices, or externally generated evidence sent directly to the auditor, such as lawyers’ representation letters or debtors’ confirmations.
The auditor must consider the persuasiveness of corroborating evidence to help them judge how much weight to place on each piece of evidence. The auditor needs to gather sufficient appropriate evidence about the assertions and the financial reports as a whole. If the evidence is very persuasive the auditor would need to gather less of it. If the evidence is not very persuasive the auditor might judge that there is not sufficient appropriate evidence to support their audit opinion, and try to gather more persuasive evidence.
The most persuasive evidence, generally, is the externally generated evidence sent directly to the auditor, and the least persuasive evidence is, generally, the internally generated evidence.


<标题> 5.6  If an auditor does not operating systems assignment 價格 sufficient knowledge and skill in an area, the auditor can ask for the assistance of an expert. This creates a problem — how does an auditor know if the expert’s work is correct if the auditor is not also an expert? Explain.

The auditor can use an expert to provide sufficient, appropriate evidence when the auditor does not operating systems assignment 價格 the requisite skills and knowledge to assess the validity of an account or a transaction. The expert could be from within or external to, the audit firm.
The auditor must decide if an expert is required and the scope of the work to be done by the expert. The auditor must assess the capacity of the expert to do the job and the expert’s level of objectivity. The auditor must assess the expert’s completed work and draw a conclusion. Ultimate responsibility rests with the auditor.

The auditor does not usually operating systems assignment 價格 the same level of expertise as the expert, but is able to assess the capacity and the objectivity of the expert based on their qualifications, experience, and association with the client.
The auditor is able to make a judgement about the validity and usefulness of the expert’s report based on their reading of the report and the consistency of the expert’s conclusions with other evidence gathered during the audit.
The expert should write the report in such a away that an auditor can understand the technical content of the report. This means that the expert should details each stage of the process used in arriving at the overall opinion or conclusion in the report. The auditor should be able to understand the process and how the expert reached the conclusion.
<标题> The expert should explain the data sources or estimation models used or calculations conducted. The auditor would be able to check the data and re-perform the calculations. The auditor will assess the consistency of any assumptions made with those in prior years and with other known information. The auditor also assesses the consistency of the expert’s report and conclusions with other information they operating systems assignment 價格 gathered about the client, and with other corroborating information gathered by the audit team.

tag:
上一篇:沒有了
Copyright ? 2008-2018 assignment代寫

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Badgeniuscs
微信

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Badgeniuscs
微信
英国代写_数学代写_c++/c代写_留学生代写怎么查出来?