澳洲論文代寫 > assignment代寫 > > 正文

assignment代寫

Supplementary Assessment: Clinical Speciality Elective 代寫

Supplementary Assessment: Clinical Speciality Elective
Please write a 1000 word essay discussing and analysing the professional
attributes and scope of practice that differentiates the specialty nurse in your
elective. The purpose of the essay is to identify the additional education and
training required to move from novice to expert in a particular field. You may
use the NMBA competencies for Registered nurses or the speciality nursing
competency related to your elective to frame your answer.
Please construct your essay with an introduction, body and conclusion. You are
required to consult nursing literature and reference your work using APA style
referencing. A marking rubric is attached to guide your writing.
? Due: 2 weeks post notification of eligibility for supplementary
assessment
? Submission via Turnitin drop box on LEO Clinical Speciality Elective site-
Assessment block.
Please be advised that if you pass the supplementary assessment, the highest
grade you can achieve is ‘Pass’ (PA). You may choose to decline your
supplementary assessment if you wish, but please note that as you are only
allowed one eligible NF grade in your course, you will not be allowed any
subsequent opportunities at supplementary assessments.
If you are unable to complete your scheduled supplementary assessment due
to exceptional circumstances (which will require documentary evidence), you
must contact the course advisor/Coordinator on your campus as soon as
possible to see if you qualify for Special Consideration.
Marking rubric for supplementary assessment NRSG 370
Criteria for marking
High Distinction
(85-100%)
Distinction
(75-84%)
Credit
(65-74%)
Pass
(50-64%)
Unsatisfactory
(0-49%)
Total mark
Discussion
Cohesive and logical
discussion.
Comprehensive and
insightful analysis.
Cohesive and logical
discussion.
Well-developed analysis
Cohesive and logical
discussion.
Some attempt at analysis
A logical discussion is
presented with limited
analysis.
Little/no cohesion to flow
of discussions.
Broad generalisations are
made.
Discussions consist largely
of personal opinion.
50%
Evidence to support the
Analysis
Relevant, high quality
literature utilised with
sophisticated
interpretation and
analysis.
Relevant, quality literature
utilised with consistent
appropriate interpretation
& application.
Relevant literature used
with erratic but
appropriate
interpretation &
application.
Some relevant literature
used with some attempt
to interpret & apply the
literature.
No use of the literature
30%
Organisation,
Presentation and
Referencing
Flawless presentation.
High standard of written
communication with few
errors of spelling and
grammar.
Mostly accurate
referencing using APA
format.
Effective written
communication with few
errors of spelling and
grammar
Mostly accurate
referencing using APA
format.
Effective written
communication although
a number of spelling and
grammatical errors.
Mostly accurate
referencing using APA
format.
Poor, written
presentation and
referencing, not at an
academic/professional
standard.
20%
Total
100%
 

tag:
Copyright ? 2008-2018 assignment代寫

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Badgeniuscs
微信